Western Washington University You are here: showcase 2004 /  showcase /  cii /  wwu 
Showcase Year: 2004-05 Embedding Ethics in Business Innovative Teaching Showcase
Innovative Teaching Showcase
CII Home Workshops and Events Teaching and Learning Resources Innovative Teaching Showcase Search Showcases
 Institutional Goals
 —Brian Burton
How to Use the Showcase About the Showcase Search
Main Page | Portfolio | Multimedia Showcase | Institutional Goals

Listed below are selected learning outcomes in the area of critical thinking that Western Washington University is actively integrating into its curriculum. Each learning outcome is listed with its definition, along with a description of how Brian Burton's teaching strategies meet each of these student learning outcome goals.

Critical Thinking

Learning Outcomes
Definition
Course Outcomes
Identification Accurately identifies and interprets evidence.

Students must identify important moral issues and affected stakeholders

Alternative Consideration Considers major alternative points of view. Students must identify alternative courses of action
Accurate Conclusions Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions. Students must show proper use of moral reasoning underlying decisions
Justification Justifies key results and procedures, and explains assumptions and reasons. Students must explain why the selected alternative fits their moral perspective


Source: Adapted from the California Academic Press's Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric available at: http://www.insightassessment.com/HCTSR.html

[top]

Writing

Learning Outcomes
Definition
Course Outcomes
Rhetorical Knowledge Focuses on a clear rhetorical purpose and responds appropriately to the needs
of varied audiences and situations.

Students must identify important moral issues and affected stakeholders

Alternative Consideration Considers major alternative points of view. Students must clearly articulate goals for the paper
Critical Analysis Develops, examines, situates, and communicates a reasoned perspective clearly to others Students must make their arguments clearly and concisely
Composing Processes Understands writing as a recursive process that involves drafting, re-thinking, editing, re- conceptualizing. Students have the opportunity to submit early drafts for comment
Convention Knowledge Uses appropriate conventions for documentation and for surface features such as syntax, grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling. Students must write well in conventional English


Source: Adapted from Western Washington University's Learning Outcomes for Writing II, available at http://pandora.cii.wwu.edu/cii/resources/writing/writing_rubric.html

[top]

©2005, last updated 4/25/06, Center for Instructional Innovation, Western Washington University
Workshops & Events | Teaching & Learning Resources | Innovative Teaching Showcase
Site Map | Contact Us | Help | Suggestion Box | Search CII
WWU Home | WWU Index | WWU Directories | WWU Search
Webmaster