Listed below are selected learning outcomes in the areas of critical thinking and writing that Western Washington University is actively integrating into its curriculum. Each learning outcome is listed with its definition, along with a description of how Julie Lockhart's teaching strategies meet each of these student learning outcome goals.
Learning Outcomes |
Definition |
Course Outcomes |
| Identification | Accurately identifies and interprets evidence. | Cases and projects in the Environmental Accounting course help students to identify issues and interpret evidence. As we discuss cases and projects, students are first asked to identify the business and sustainability issues. For example, in the Specialty Glass case, the issues include toxic inputs and waste, excessive packaging and electricity use, and waste treatment options. I also ask the students to identify the relevant facts in the case that will help in recommending a solution. |
| Alternative Consideration | Considers major alternative points of view. | Alternative points of view abound, especially in the area of sustainability. We evaluate solutions to environmental cases that span from the do nothing approach to an eco-centric approach where sustainability is the most important decision criteria. For each alternative, I ask students to consider the consequences to the company and to the environment. We also look at the points-of-view that stakeholder groups might have in an environmental disaster. In the Olympic Pipeline Explosion project, students are asked about different information needs given the various stakeholder roles. |
| Accurate Conclusions | Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions. | Informed conclusions come from exploring issues, facts, and alternative courses of action. Once the students have a good understanding of all options and opportunities, they are asked to come to a conclusion. |
| Justification | Justifies key results and procedures, and explains assumptions and reasons. | I foster a learning environment where students feel comfortable expressing their views. Once they take a position, they need to justify it in class discussion and in writing assignments. |
Source: Adapted from the California Academic Press's Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric available at: http://www.insightassessment.com/HCTSR.html
Learning Outcomes |
Definition |
Course Outcomes |
Rhetorical Knowledge |
Focuses on a clear rhetorical purpose and responds appropriately to the needs of varied audiences and situations. |
Students have various writing assignments throughout the course, including short reflection pieces, reports that require some outside research, and summaries of sustainability reporting in practice. |
Critical Analysis |
Develops, examines, situates, and communicates a reasoned perspective clearly to others. |
In all assignments, students need to clearly articulate their point of view, backed up by reasons appropriate to the assignment. |
Composing Processes |
Understands writing as a recursive process that involves drafting, re-thinking, editing, reconceptualizing. |
Several of the writing projects are group projects. Students must work together to edit their work before submitting an assignment. |
Convention Knowledge |
Uses appropriate conventions for documentation and for surface features such as syntax, grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling. |
Students hear from me that communication cannot be effective without appropriate syntax, grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling. I mark papers for conventions and grade down if proper care has not been taken. |
Source: Adapted from the California Academic Press's Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric available at: http://www.insightassessment.com/HCTSR.html
2006-07 Innovative Teaching Showcase Home | Center for Instructional Innovation Home | Western Washington University Home