Back to Main Text-only Page :: See also: Institutional Goals

Portfolio

A Course Dedicated to Environment and Sustainability

by Julie A. Lockhart, Professor and Chair
Department of Accounting

Environmental Accounting Education

During a sabbatical leave in Scotland at the Center for Social and Environmental Accounting Research, I observed a very different perspective on education that continues to shape my teaching. Inspired by my time there, I designed a course, Environmental Accounting, which has become a model for others interested in this area of teaching 1 and for which I won the Cayden Chase Franklin Excellence in Teaching Award. Environmental Accounting (Accounting 484) is a seminar-style, senior-level elective where I strive to accomplish three primary goals:

  1. The most obvious goal is to help students expand their awareness of the accounting profession's responsibility toward environmental challenges.
  2. I also aim to encourage independent thought through writing and speaking opportunities. 
  3. Perhaps the most important and challenging goal is fostering "deep learning."  Gray et al. (1994, p. 55) state that "deep learning involves some change in the student—in conceptions, perceptions, understanding and reaction." 2  Although the course is an elective in our program, it has components of a capstone experience in that it integrates several sub-disciplines of accounting and asks students to critically evaluate the role of accounting in environmental issues.

Accounting 484 is organized around a four-part framework that allows students to examine environmental issues--both macro (societal) and micro (firm)--within the conventional model and an expanded model of accounting. The expanded model encourages students to go beyond the traditional boundaries of accounting through a critical evaluation of the assumptions and objectives of mainstream economics and its ramifications for accounting.

Thus, I have adopted a broad definition of environmental accounting that includes: the moral imperatives of environmental accounting issues; an examination of the role of accounting in mitigating society's environmental problems; an analysis of reporting objectives and alternative reporting formats (e.g., sustainability reporting); an expanded definition of stakeholders; and an examination of internal corporate initiatives for the environment. The expanded model calls to question many of the assumptions in our conventional accounting system. For example, because our economic system does not recognize the social costs of environmental damage unless an actual monetary transaction exists, corporations also do not recognize and report on these social costs. Thus, the expanded model attempts to create ways in which companies can be accountable for the full cost of environmental impacts outside of the conventional model. I have carefully selected readings, which I update every year, on current research from all over the English-speaking world to expose my students to a wide variety of conventional and expanded points-of-view, including experimentation with new methods.3

Recently Developed Assignments
Continuing Assignments

Evolving the Learning Process

Recently, I was invited to write an education essay for a publication that will celebrate the career of my colleague and co-author M. R. (Reg) Mathews upon her retirement. 4 This invitation gave me a unique opportunity to reflect on my approach to environmental accounting education, and I was able to make some significant changes to my course that were very well-received by the students. Through the process of writing the essay, I came to believe that my current teaching methods have relied too much on a "banking approach" to education. The banking approach is one in which students passively gain knowledge from the teacher who is in control of the educational process (Thomson and Bebbington 2004).5 After further research, I saw that while I expose my students to many new ideas in how they view the role of accounting in society, as instructor, I have done too much "telling" based on my own analysis.  As stated by Bebbington and Thomson (2001, 353), 6 "exposing students to 'critical' or alternative academic ideas is not in itself enough to create deep learning or develop critical reasoning." Bebbington and Thomson (2001) advocate for a "dialogic educational process" which "seeks to engage students as co-investigators in a particular subject area."

In the 2006 academic year, I created several new class activities/projects to encourage a dialogic learning process.  These activities reflected a "'problem-posing' pedagogy" (Bebbington and Thomson 2001, 355) allowing the students to "critically engage" in their understanding of the assumptions of conventional accounting practices. This change involved an incremental process of transforming the course into one which builds co-investigative activities into the list of classroom activities. It also required stepping away from my safe zone as an educator. Most of the changes that I made to foster a dialogic educational process were well-received by the students.

Aspirations for the Future

I continue to look for interesting environmental case studies that have implications for accounting. These provide students with an opportunity to put themselves inside the situation when looking at issues, facts, and alternatives. I also hope to instill an interest in sustainability across the curriculum in accounting. In our department, we have engaged in discussions of its importance and several faculty have published in areas related to sustainability. Ideally, students who graduate from our program will have a good understanding of how the accounting profession can participate in a sustainable business future.

Footnotes

  1.    See Lockhart, Julie A. and M. R. Mathews.  Teaching Environment Accounting:  A Four Part Framework.  Advances in Accounting Education Vol. 3: 57-84.

  2.     Gray, R.H., K.J. Bebbington, and K. McPhail (1994) "Teaching ethics in accounting and the ethics of accounting teaching: Educating for immorality and a possible case for social and environmental accounting education."  Accounting Education, 3(1): 51-75.

  3.     For example, Ontario Hydro has experimented with including environmental externalities in decision making.  See Boone, C. and H. Howes (1996), "Accounting for the Environment."  CMA Magazine (May): 22-24.

  4.     Lockhart, Julie A. (2007)  A Festive Trip-le Step across the Dance Floor of Environmental Accounting Education.  Forthcoming in Social Accounting, Mega Accounting and Beyond: A Festschrift in Honour of M. R. Mathews, edited by Rob Gray and James Guthrie (St Andrews, CSEAR Publishing).

  5.     Thomson, I. and J. Bebbington.  2004.  It doesn't matter what you teach.  Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15:  609-628.

  6.     Bebbington, J. and I. Thomson.  2001.  Commentary on:  Some thoughts on social and environmental accounting education.  Accounting Education, 10(4): 353-355.

 

2006-07 Innovative Teaching Showcase Home | Center for Instructional Innovation Home | Western Washington University Home